WHERE HAS AFSC 13BX TAKEN YOU
SEE WHERE OTHERS HAVE BEEN
SEE WHERE OTHERS HAVE BEEN
This website serves as a repository for stories and accounts related to the history of Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSC) 1744 and 13BX. Originally known as Weapons Controllers starting in the 1950s, these professionals have evolved into Air Battle Managers, adapting to advancements in airborne and ground technology. Their roles have become highly mobile and are global in reach.
An E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System assigned to the 962nd Airborne Air Control Squadron takes off from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Nov. 7, 2023. The aircraft provides an accurate, real-time picture of the battlespace to the Joint Air Operations Center. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Julia Lebens)
This is an attempt to identify assignments for personnel with AFSC 13BX today and working back in time. There are many holes in this information and it is hoped there will be contributions. Much of this information can be found on Wikipedia. If you have anything to share please contact: squawkflash@gmail.com
552nd Air Control Wing, Tinker AFB,
552nd Air Control Group support the E-3 AWACS Fleet.
Facebook Groups: 552d Air Control Wing and AWACS Crew Members.
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)
A good introduction to the air defense of Europe can be found here.
Middle East: Noble Eagle, Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom see:
Mobileradar.org an excellent research site for Unit names and equipment descriptions.
Alaska
Fire Island AFS, 626 AC&W Squadron, 1951-69
Murphy Dome, 20 miles NW Fairbanks, 1959-present, 744 AC&W Squadron 1953-83
Fort Yukon AFS, 709 AC&W Squadron, 1958-present
For a good overall history, see: Alaskan Air Command - Wikipedia
Kotzebue Air Force Station, 748th Aircraft Control and Warning Squadron, 1958–1983. See their story here.
Iceland
932nd Aircraft Control and Warning Squadron, activated, 1 May 1952 near Keflavik Air Base plus three outlying radar sites spread around Iceland were all possible assignments for Weapons Controllers (AFCS 1744). A description of the unit’s history may be found here.
Also see a Facebook Group, “Veterans of 932 ACS/Rockville”.
Canada
Canadian Forces Base North Bay, Ontario, NORAD & SAGE operations in Canada
RCAF Station St. Margaret’s, New Brunswick, 21st AC&W Squadron (BUIC II) 1953-89
RCAF Station Senneterre, Quebec, 34 AC&W Squadron (BUIC III) 1968-1988,
SAGE (Semi-Automated Ground Environment)
There were 22 operational SAGE Centers in the United States and one in Canada constructed and operated during the cold war for air defense of the North American Continent. A comprehensive description and background may be found at:
Semi-Automatic Ground Environment - Wikipedia
BUIC (Back-up Intercept Control)
The BUIC system utilized solid state computers and thus required much less space than the vacuum tube driven SAGE computers. This enabled these systems to be installed at various SAGE radar sites where space was limited. There were 3 generations of BUIC, I, II and III. Weapons Controllers at the BUIC sites could follow the air battle in real time and take control of the interceptors in the event the affiliated SAGE center were incapacitated. A comprehensive description and background may be found here.
505th Tactical Air Control Group
On 2 November 1965, the 505 ACWG was re-activated as the 505th Tactical Control Group (TCG). Replacing the 6250th Tactical Air Support Group that activated three months earlier, 505 TCG called Tan Son Nhut Air Base in South Vietnam home. The 505th was responsible with providing Command and Control (C2), for the Tactical Control System in Southeast Asia (SEA). This mission included the operation of numerous radar sites throughout South Vietnam and Thailand from 1965 to 1973. In addition to the radar sites, the group managed O-1 Bird Dog observation aircraft assigned to five squadrons from late 1965 through 1966. These O-1 units included the 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd and 23d Tactical Air Support Squadrons, operating from various bases throughout SEA. Forward Air Controllers (FACs) flew the "Bird Dogs" to find and mark enemy activity, direct air strikes and perform battle damage assessment.
The 505th was reassigned to the Seventh Air Force on 1 April 1966. The group eventually lost its flying squadrons but the radar mission grew. The 505th was the only unit to provide all of SEA with an electronics ground environment system for aircraft control and warning and radar services. After eight years of service in Vietnam the unit earned thirteen campaign streamers and five Air Force Outstanding Unit Awards with Combat "V" devices. With the American withdrawal in 1973 came the unit's inactivation.
619thTactical Control Squadron activated at Tan Son Nhut Air Base on 8 April 1964 with control center call-sign “Paris”. It was responsible for operating and maintaining air traffic control and radar direction-finding equipment for the area from the Mekong Delta to Ban Me Thuot in the Central Highlands with detachments at various smaller airfields throughout its operational area. It remained operational until 15 March 1973.
620thTactical Control Squadron with responsibility from Pleiku to the DMZ, was located at Monkey Mountain Facility on the east side of DaNang bay. Call-sign “Panama” closed in March 1973.
621stTactical Control Squadron which supported tactical air operations in Thailand and Laos, located at Ubon Royal Thai Air Force Base, and later at Udorn Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand, 23 Feb 1966-8 Jan 1975
7thAirborne Command and Control Squadron (constituted and activated, 13 Feb 1968) flew C-130’s out of Udorn and functioned as airborne battlefield command and control centers. They were in the air nearly 24/7 with the daytime call-sign “Hillsboro” and night time call-sign “Moonbeam”. Other call-signs used were “Cricket” and “Ally Cat”. The unit remained active following the Vietnam War and was Redesignated the 7th Expeditionary Airborne Command and Control Squadron and was activated, 27 Mar 2008. For a complete history of the unit see here.
553rd Reconnaissance Wing, activated in 1967 and based in Thailand until inactivation in 1970 The EC-121s were used extensively in Southeast Asia between 16 April 1965, and 1 June 1974, particularly in support of Operation Rolling Thunder and Operation Linebacker/Linebacker II, providing radar early warning and limited airborne control of USAF fighter forces engaging MiG interceptors. Flying orbits over the Gulf of Tonkin and later over Laos, they were the forerunners of AWACS aircraft. Lockheed EC-121 Warning Star - Wikipedia
The 407L TACS program provided the equipment that could perform command planning and direction, aircraft control and warning, direct air support coordination and air traffic regulation. All within one system. A excellent description may be found at:
place holder
Pamper Control, Camp Evans, Viet Nam
I was on duty January 20, 1972 with 1st Lt. Jay Schwarz. Jay was flight following a Huey from Phu Bai when we heard a call on Guard (emergency channel) from a pilot who had just lost his wingman and had seen them eject from their aircraft. We had him change to Pamper’s frequency and he described that he could see the downed airmen near where the main road crossed into Laos. When the army pilots heard this they said they could pick up the downed flyers. We plotted the location on our wall map and directed the Huey in that direction. I don’t think the army pilots realized at the time that their newly agreed to mission would take them into Laos, but they pressed ahead. Vietnam is not very wide where we were, only about 40-50 miles to Laos, and the Huey was several miles west of Phu Bai when this all started, but after they had been heading west for several minutes they were expressing some apprehension. (As controllers we had no command authority to direct any pilot. Our role was to provide a little safety in what was otherwise a chaotic environment.) This is when the F-4 pilot said that he had a visual contact on the downed flyers and if they could get on the ground they would definitely be able to pick them up. That was all the Huey pilots needed to hear. They pressed ahead without saying another word. They were able to pick up the downed pilots without incident and turned for home but they were running low on fuel and it was getting dark. Camp Evans is about 20 miles northwest from Phu Bai so the Huey pilots decided to land there. One of the F-4 pilots came to the trailer (a refrigeration van from an old 18-wheeler) where our radar scopes were in order to use the land line to call is home squadron in Da Nang. He wanted to report they had been picked up and were uninjured. Then he began answering questions as to why he’d lost the aircraft. It was a little like listening to someone telling their dad why they had wrecked the family car.
Here is the entry from Viet Nam Air Losses by Chris Hobson, page 218.
"20 January 1972
F-4E Tail No. 67-0247
421 Tactical Fighter Squadron
366 Tactical Fighter Wing, USAF, Da Nang
Capt CJ Davis (survived)
Capt RK Venables (survived)
The second Phantom lost on the 20th was a Stormy FAC aircraft that was taking part in a bombing mission on a section of road on the Ho Chi Minh Trail about 20 miles west of Khe Sanh. The aircraft was hit in the fuselage by 23mm AAA and burst into flames. The crew ejected a few miles from the road and were eventually rescued by a US Army helicopter."
The epilog to this story is that the Huey was airborne on a maintenance test flight and there was only a pilot and co-pilot, no door gunner, no armament of any sort. It wasn’t until the downed pilots had been brought aboard was anybody armed. The Army pilot’s commander wanted to court martial them for violating a standing order by flying into Laos and the Air Force wanted to decorate them for bravery. I never did hear how that turned out, but my vote is absolutely for bravery.
Panama Control, Monkey Mountain, Vietnam
Near the end of my tour in July 1972 it was a routinely busy day on scope when a Navy A-7 I was flight following back to his carrier called saying his number 2 wingman had been hit and had ejected from the aircraft. Then in rapid succession he reported that his number 1 wingman had been hit and also ejected. They were located between Hue and Da Nang and about ten miles inland. I gave him heading and distance to Da Nang and told him to squawk emergency. He then said he had been hit, losing altitude and was “stepping over the side” (apparently Navy jargon for abandoning ship). So in the space of a couple of minutes where I once had a flight of three aircraft I now had none with pilots floating to the ground.
I have always been haunted by this, I think mainly because I never knew what had happened to these guys and because it had happened so close to Da Nang. Were the North Vietnamese really that close and armed with the Soviet’s new shoulder held surface-to-air SA-7 missiles? How else could they have been shot down? Here is the entry from Viet Nam Air Losses by Chris Hobson, page 232.
"July 17, 1972
F-4D Tail number 66-8772
497 Tactical Fighter Squadron
8 Tactical Fighter Wing, Ubon, Thailand
1Lt GK Tushek (survived)
Captain Wayne Gordon Brown (KIA)
A-7C Tail number 156792
VA-86 US Navy, USS America
Cmdr. William D. Yonke (survived)
A-7C Tail number 156771
VA-86 US Navy, USS America
Lt DK Anderson (survived)
In a remarkable incident a Night Owl FAC Phantom and two Navy Corsairs were lost on a night mission about 20 miles southwest of Hue’. The Phantom was guiding the Corsairs to a target using its LORAN navigation system to pinpoint the target. The three aircraft were in close formation as the A-7’s dropped their Mk82 bombs simultaneously on the Phantom’s mark. One of the bombs exploded prematurely damaging all three aircraft. The Phantom became a mass of flame and both the crew ejected from the aircraft but Captain Brown was badly injured. At first light an OV-10 arrived on the scene and spoke to both survivors on their emergency radios. Captain Brown had injured his back and was unable to move. The FAC called in a strike to secure the area around the survivors and shortly afterwards a pair of Skyraiders arrived followed by two HH-53’s. One of the helicopters descended below the low clouds but had to abort the rescue attempt when strong winds and turbulence over the mountains, in addition to ground fire, and almost crashed. However, before the next rescue attempt could be made gunshots were heard by 1Lt Tushek near where Captain Brown was thought to be hiding and the rescue commander could not regain radio contact with the Captain. The winds abated a little so the rescue forces returned just before sunset and an HH-53 from the 37th ARRS eventually winched 1Lt Tushek to safety in most difficult conditions caused by weather, terrain and enemy action.
Both Corsairs had also been damaged in the incident and Commander Yonke’s aircraft caught fire. He turned towards the coast but lost control as the fire burned through the flying controls. The CO (Commanding Officer) of VA-86 ejected just south of Hue’ and was soon recovered. His wingman, Lt Anderson, managed to make the coast but was losing fuel rapidly and flamed out about 15 miles northeast of Da Nang. He was rescued by a USAF SAR helicopter. Malfunctioning ordinance had been a minor but persistent cause of aircraft attrition in Southeast Asia."
So it had been friendly fire and not Soviet SA-7’s and it was an Air Force F-4 and two Navy A-7’s. Based on the above description, I believe the pilot I was talking to was Lt Anderson. The thing I remember most during the radio exchange with Lt. Anderson, was his demeanor. His voice never wavered or showed any excitement. It was as if we were sitting in the O-Club enjoying a beer. I’m relieved to learn he survived.
Panama Control, Monkey Mountain, Vietnam
The tankers were KC-135’s, a version of the four-engine Boeing 707. The fighters were all Air Force and primarily F-4’s and F-105’s. A tanker cell consisted of three KC-135’s, separated by 500 feet of altitude and one-half mile in trail. The lead tanker was the highest of the three. Typically, each tanker would receive a flight of three or four fighters. The fighters, laden with bombs, would take-off with minimum fuel and would go on tanker not long after being airborne to fill-up before making their bombing runs. At the time Monkey Mountain controlled one refueling area, about 10 miles off the coast from Hue. The fighters would come out of Northern Thailand in flights of three or four and in rapid succession. The F-105’s always went on the lowest tanker at 7,500 feet and the two flights of F-4’s on the next two tankers at 8,000 and 8,500 feet altitude. Just prior to each refueling session we would receive a classified message from 7th Air Force detailing the fighters by call-sign, aircraft type and which tanker was theirs. Once all the scheduled fighters were with their assigned tanker, the lead tanker would be released to their own navigation and head north. In the spring of 1972 we were bombing North Vietnam basically with everything we had. (see Operation Linebacker - Wikipedia) The fighters would return to Thailand through Laos with refueling controlled by radar sites in Thailand. Occasionally we did refuel a returning fighter and those were almost always emergencies, low on fuel, battle damage or both. I conducted over 1,000 rendezvous during a five-month period starting in March 1972.
I remember one refueling session as being particularly intense. The tanker cell arrived early in the morning as scheduled. I was seeing cloud formations on the radar screen and the tanker pilot was reporting limited visibility at refueling altitudes. I directed him to what appeared to be a hole in the clouds several miles across and asked if he could set-up an orbit with a standard turn rate in the clear area. He replied that he thought that would work. Normally we just ran the tankers on an oval track telling them when to turn to head back the opposite direction, but this would be a circle with a constant banked turn. The fighters started to arrive, and I explained what we had going on and then joined each flight on their tanker. Once they were all in position I released the tankers to their own navigation and they headed north with “chicks in tow”. So it worked, at least from my vantage point. But I don’t hear what the pilots are saying to each other. When the tankers came back to head home they would check-in on our traffic control frequency and our Senior Director would flight-follow them back to the hand-off point for their home base at U-Tapao, Thailand. The tanker pilot told my Senior Director that Panama 19 should be commended for conducting one of the best refueling sessions he had seen. I suggested that comment be placed in my performance evaluation. Pilots complementing controllers did not happen very often.
I arrived at Mt. Laguna Air Force Station, near the top of a 7,500-foot-high mountain due east from San Diego, California in November of 1969. Mt Laguna AFS was a Back-Up Intercept Control (BUIC III) Detachment of the 751st Air Defense Group located at Luke AFB, Arizona. Our primary mission was to assume air defense of the California coast in the event the SAGE Center at Luke became unable to perform that role. We also took over the active air defense role once a week during the night shift. All other time was devoted to training, both simulated and live aircraft. Our most frequent intercept training was with a California Air National Guard unit that flew F-102’s out of Ontario, California (call sign x-ray lima, XL). The F-102 was a sub-sonic delta winged aircraft with limited capability as an interceptor. We also controlled Air Force F-106’s out of Oxnard AFB and Hamilton AFB (call sign alpha hotel, AH). The F-106 was a more modern version of the 102, super-sonic and data link capable, armed with nuclear tipped air-to-air missiles.
The training area we used was called Whisky-291 (W-291) and was a VFR (visual flight rules) air space, reserved for general purpose military training southwest from San Diego. Consequently, there were usually Navy aircraft in the air space too. One exercise I remember consisted of two F-102’s and one EB-66. The EB-66 was to be the target and was able to deploy electric-countermeasures for the 102’s to practice against. The countermeasures also presented problems for our radar and I lost track of where it was. There was air traffic in the immediate vicinity I mistook for the EB-66 and directed the 102’s to that target. When the 102 pilot asked if I knew where the EB-66 was, I knew I had a problem. What I thought was the target turned out to be two Navy F-4’s who weren’t too happy having been jumped by two Air Force 102’s. Apparently none of the pilots filed a report as I never heard another thing about the incident.
Another training mission I was the controller for was night time intercept training for the F-102’s and a B-52 target. We had reserved two contiguous air spaces over the Los Angeles basin called Big Bear and Twentynine Palms. I don’t remember the exact altitude for the reservation, but it was high, probably around 30,000 feet. As you might imagine there was a lot of air traffic in the Basin, especially into and out of LAX and presumably, at a much lower altitude. Consequently, it was hopeless to give the pilots you were controlling meaningful traffic calls. This was the only time I was in close control of a B-52, either simulated or actual, and I was not familiar with its turning radius. On one occasion during one of the intercept passes the B-52 sloshed out of the airspace. I asked the B-52 pilot to “expedite” the turn and he replied that he was. But it wasn’t enough. The next day I learned that a Lear jet pilot had filed a near-miss complaint after landing at LAX and described the aircraft as a B-52. I braced myself for an inquiry but one was never called. The B-52 pilot had not reported a near miss, so it could have happened any time during the training session. The Los Angles Air Traffic Control Center’s response to the complaint was that the Lear jet was at an unauthorized altitude for a proper approach into LAX. No one asked me if I had allowed the aircraft out of the airspace and I did not volunteer the information.
An E-3 Sentry assigned to Tinker Air Force Base, Okla., leads a formation of F-15 Eagles assigned to Langley Air Force Base, Va., over the coast of North Carolina. The E-3 Sentry is an airborne warning and control system aircraft that provides weather surveillance using its radar subsystem that permits surveillance from the Earth's surface up into the stratosphere, overland or water. (U.S. Air
A NATO E-3A Sentry (AWACS) approaches a Utah Air National Guard KC-135R Stratotanker for air refueling during a training exercise May 2014, over Germany. (Utah Air National Guard photo/Staff Sgt. Annie Edwards). https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/
A NATO E-3A (AWACS) Sentry aircraft flies on a mission over Southern Germany on Sept. 11, 2012. The Sentry is operated by a multinational crew composed of 14 different NATO countries to include members of the U.S. Air Force stationed at Gelsenkirchen NATO Air Base, Germany. (U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Bennie J. Davis III). https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/
1st Lt. Andrew Stokes (left), a 961st Airborne Air Control Squadron (AACS) air weapons officer, speaks with Philippine Air Force Maj. Frederick Facia, the 581st Aircraft Control and Training Squadron commander while onboard a 961st AACS E-3 Sentry AWACS during exercise Balikatan on April 23, 2015. The 961st AACS has integrated 20 PAF weapons controllers during their missions. The 961st AACS is sta
Staff Sgt. Jacob Martin views a radar scope Oct. 14, 2009, at Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D. The base recently switched from airport surveillance radar to digital airport surveillance radar. Sergeant Martin is a 28th Operations Support Squadron air traffic controller. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Corey Hook) https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/
BALAD AIR BASE, Iraq - Senior Airman Frank Gilman, 332nd Expeditionary Operations Support Squadron, air traffic controller, works the Balad Center Scope position at the Combined Enroute Radar Approach Control (CERAP) facility here. Vital to the air traffic control team at Balad are the 38 air traffic controllers at the CERAP who work about 75,000 miles of Iraqi airspace. (U.S. Air Force photo/S
Lockheed EC-121 Warning Star
EC-121s were used extensively in Southeast Asia between 16 April 1965, and 1 June 1974, particularly in support of Operation Rolling Thunder and Operation Linebacker/Linebacker II, providing radar early warning and limited airborne control of USAF fighter forces engaging MiG interceptors. Flying orbits over the Gulf of Tonkin and later over Laos, they were the forer
The Boom operator's view of a KC-135 refueling a B-52D during the Vietnam War. Notice the B-52 is armed.
A KC-135 refueling an F-4C during the Vietnam War. Note the F-4 is armed. The F-4 was the workhorse of the Vietnam War.
A KC-135 refueling a flight of F-105D's during the Vietnam War. Note the 105's are armed. The F-105 has the unfortunate distinction of having the highest loss rate per sortie flown by any fixed wing aircraft in the Vietnam War. They were always the first in and the last out.
place holder
place holder
Much of the information for this site has come from Wikipedia. An attempt has been made to show a link in all cases to identify the source.
United States Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps fixed-wing aircraft losses in Southeast Asia 1961-1973. Copyrighted by Christopher Michael Hobson, 2001.
This is a comprehensive and thorough accounting of these losses and in many cases provides context as it relates to the war.
All photos have been taken from the Air Force Museum web site at https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/
On their home page scroll down to the bottom and click on Air Force Photos. That will take you to a searchable photo library. The exception is the photo of the EC-121, which was taken from Wikipedia.
Your feedback and input to make this a more complete project will be appreciated. First person accounts may be posted with or without attribution at your request.
Please email: squawkflash@gmail.com
Copyright © 2024 Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 1744 - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.